I’m just sitting back and eating my popcornoh god is this thread still going...
Minecraft Middle Earth is a Minecraft community that recreates the world described by JRR Tolkien and his writings. Everyone can participate in organized events in which we collaborate to create major landmarks, terrain, caves, castles, towns, farms and more.
To get started, visit The New Player Guide
Joining the server can be done straight away, but you will have to pass the New Player Quiz. Use the The New Player Guide to get acquainted with our community.
I’m just sitting back and eating my popcornoh god is this thread still going...
U seem to always be sitting back with ur popcorn mapyI’m just sitting back and eating my popcorn
If your definition of success is a month of increasing player count followed by a month of decreasing player count right back to where it was before the video released, then sure, we can call it a success.Soo I guess this was a success
View attachment 11397
Still every day we get new ppl from the Keralis tour, so it certainly wasn't one babyboom.
The sas is realll, but indo makes a fair pointIf your definition of success is a month of increasing player count followed by a month of decreasing player count right back to where it was before the video released, then sure, we can call it a success.
Still every day we get new ppl from the Keralis tour, so it certainly wasn't one babyboo
Most Players who joined just after the video releases were Keralis 'fanboys' and actually left after one visits. Those who joined afterwards stayed relatively more often, because they are more builders instead of YouTube watchers; they maybe didn't even see the video through their Keralis subscription but it jumped into their feed (weeks after it was releases) or it was a result for Middle-earth server.If your definition of success is a month of increasing player count followed by a month of decreasing player count right back to where it was before the video released, then sure, we can call it a success.
Well you can clearly see in that graf that we're about 4 units higher on the graph now than the average before Keralis' video so that means we've increased by about 15%.If your definition of success is a month of increasing player count followed by a month of decreasing player count right back to where it was before the video released, then sure, we can call it a success.
First, the graph shows max people connected in a month, not average. Second, the max in March before keralis was around 28-29, which now in June the max looks to be around 30. So more 3-5% increase, not 15%.Well you can clearly see in that graf that we're about 4 units higher on the graph now than the average before Keralis' video so that means we've increased by about 15%.
If we compare it to june last year you can see a good increase.First, the graph shows max people connected in a month, not average. Second, the max in March before keralis was around 28-29, which now in June the max looks to be around 30. So more 3-5% increase, not 15%.
I think it looks like the average of that graph is around 26-27 before the video and 30 after which is an increase of 11-15% but whatever, it's still an increase.First, the graph shows max people connected in a month, not average. Second, the max in March before keralis was around 28-29, which now in June the max looks to be around 30. So more 3-5% increase, not 15%.
Except this isn’t a graph of averages, it’s a graph of maxes. You could have had one day in June that had 30 people due to some special event and the rest of the days could have had 12 people max, but this graph would still use the 30 people day as the statistic. It’s a bad graph for the point that was trying to be proven.I think it looks like the average of that graph is around 26-27 before the video and 30 after which is an increase of 11-15% but whatever, it's still an increase.
Hmmm. Ok, fair enough.Except this isn’t a graph of averages, it’s a graph of maxes. You could have had one day in June that had 30 people due to some special event and the rest of the days could have had 12 people max, but this graph would still use the 30 people day as the statistic. It’s a bad graph for the point that was trying to be proven.