chuckie001
Dirt Conaisseur
I have noticed Methelburg being built between the Misty Mountains and Mirkwood, north of Carrock, and as I understand it, it's planned to be a non-deserted, populated town. That worries me a bit regarding the logical conflicts with the canon (mainly The Hobbit), and I'll try to present the points here:
The town is (AFAIK) not mentioned by name anywhere in canon. I was pointed only to Melburg on the Middle-earth Role Playing wiki.
This is the (non-canon) map I was shown: Mirkwood Status Map - ISETAR
canon fact:
Thorin's company traveled from Goblin Gate to Eagle's Eyries and then to Carrock (by eagles), then to Beorn's Home (on foot), then north to the Elf-Road (on ponies).
canon fact:
[when riding north, from Beorn to the Elf-Road] …they rode now for two more days, and all the while they saw nothing save grass and flowers and birds and scattered trees, and occasionally small herds of red deer browsing or sitting at noon in the shade. —The Hobbit
concern:
The last leg of this journey would take them very close to Methelburg, if it was where the non-canon map shows it. If the town was populated, why would the book never mention it? The distance to Methelburg was as short as from Carrock to Beorn, so they could go to the town even on foot, if they were forbidden by Beorn to take his ponies there. In the town, they could get fresher supplies (although Beorn's supplies would last quite long), or at least some news. At the very least, the book should have mentioned it (and outlying farms and such), and why they weren't going there, instead of saying they saw nothing but grass and flowers and trees.
canon fact:
“The goblins,” Beorn had said, “will not dare to cross the Great River for a hundred miles north of the Carrock nor to come near my house — it is well protected at night! — but I should ride fast; for if they make their raid soon they will cross the river to the south and scour all the edge of the forest so as to cut you off, and Wargs run swifter than ponies. Still you are safer going north, even though you seem to be going back nearer to their strongholds; for that is what they will least expect, and they will have the longer ride to catch you. Be off now as quick as you may!” —The Hobbit
concern:
Beorn discourages them from using the Old Forest Road in the south (and recommends the northern Elf-Road), but also says that going north means going nearer to goblin strongholds, but doesn't say anything about getting very near a large human settlement (which should be safer than open road, and definitely safer than goblin strongholds). Also, if there was a large human settlement to the north, why wouldn't the goblins expect the company to go there and seek protection?
canon fact:
In spite of the dangers of this far land bold men had of late been making their way back into it from the South, cutting down trees, and building themselves places to live in among the more pleasant woods in the valleys and along the river-shores. —The Hobbit
canon fact:
The Lord of the Eagles would not take them anywhere near where men lived. “They would shoot at us with their great bows of yew,” he said, “for they would think we were after their sheep. And at other times they would be right. No! we are glad to cheat the goblins of their sport, and glad to repay our thanks to you, but we will not risk ourselves for dwarves in the southward plains.” —The Hobbit
concern:
It clearly says men had been making their way back into the Wilderness (not that there were sizeable populations living there all the time), and that they were coming from the south, not from the north, where Methelburg is supposed to be. And when refusing to go where people live, the Lord of the Eagles refuses to fly south, but says nothing about people in the north.
canon fact:
Of this kind were the peoples of the upper vales of Anduin: the Beornings, and the Woodmen of Western Mirkwood; and further north and east the Men of the Long Lake and of Dale. —The Return of the King (Appendix F)
concern:
Only the Beornings and Woodmen (i.e., those bold men coming back, up the vale from the south) are listed as the peoples of the upper vales of Anduin. There's no mention of any organized town between Mirkwood and the mountains surviving from the past. This part of the Appendices is longer and discusses the languages of all men (in this particular paragraph those in the northern regions), but when it wants to talk about men to the north of Beornings and Woodmen, it needs to jump eastwards to Long Lake and Dale (having no-one to talk about directly north of Carrock; the Éothéod/Rohirrim are discussed as already having completely migrated south). Also note that Tolkien writes “furhter north and east”, but Long Lake and Dale aren't that much more to the north than the supposed location of Methelburg -- if Tolkien counted the area as far north as this as being populated by Beornings, wouldn't he describe Long Lake and Dale as being mainly “further east”? (And remember, there were basically no “Beornings” as such until after the Battle of Five Armies, Beorn was a loner; so all this is describing a very recent state of affairs.)
Atlas of Middle-earth fact:
The only thing north of Beorn on any of the maps (even the newest) is Framsburg, and that is further north, and marked as ruins.
concern:
If there was a living town nearer to the path of Thorin's company, wouldn't it be marked on the map? Even in the non-canon Middle-earth Role Playing wiki, where the Methelburg description came from, Framsburg is described as about 4 times smaller (340 people vs. 1200), and yet it appears in the Atlas, while Methelburg does not. Also, Framsburg is not described as ruins, which casts even more doubt on the reliability of either the Atlas, or Middle-earth Role Playing wiki.
Can all this be somehow explained and be made to make logical sense? There are also some concerns other than logic, namely scale: adding a town that size in that area kind of breaks the wildness of the Wilderness, I think (it's actually visible from our Mirkwood) -- but that is only my personal opinion. The points above, however, are really dealing with the canon-ness of the town, not just the way it looks in MCME.
The town is (AFAIK) not mentioned by name anywhere in canon. I was pointed only to Melburg on the Middle-earth Role Playing wiki.
This is the (non-canon) map I was shown: Mirkwood Status Map - ISETAR
canon fact:
Thorin's company traveled from Goblin Gate to Eagle's Eyries and then to Carrock (by eagles), then to Beorn's Home (on foot), then north to the Elf-Road (on ponies).
canon fact:
[when riding north, from Beorn to the Elf-Road] …they rode now for two more days, and all the while they saw nothing save grass and flowers and birds and scattered trees, and occasionally small herds of red deer browsing or sitting at noon in the shade. —The Hobbit
concern:
The last leg of this journey would take them very close to Methelburg, if it was where the non-canon map shows it. If the town was populated, why would the book never mention it? The distance to Methelburg was as short as from Carrock to Beorn, so they could go to the town even on foot, if they were forbidden by Beorn to take his ponies there. In the town, they could get fresher supplies (although Beorn's supplies would last quite long), or at least some news. At the very least, the book should have mentioned it (and outlying farms and such), and why they weren't going there, instead of saying they saw nothing but grass and flowers and trees.
canon fact:
“The goblins,” Beorn had said, “will not dare to cross the Great River for a hundred miles north of the Carrock nor to come near my house — it is well protected at night! — but I should ride fast; for if they make their raid soon they will cross the river to the south and scour all the edge of the forest so as to cut you off, and Wargs run swifter than ponies. Still you are safer going north, even though you seem to be going back nearer to their strongholds; for that is what they will least expect, and they will have the longer ride to catch you. Be off now as quick as you may!” —The Hobbit
concern:
Beorn discourages them from using the Old Forest Road in the south (and recommends the northern Elf-Road), but also says that going north means going nearer to goblin strongholds, but doesn't say anything about getting very near a large human settlement (which should be safer than open road, and definitely safer than goblin strongholds). Also, if there was a large human settlement to the north, why wouldn't the goblins expect the company to go there and seek protection?
canon fact:
In spite of the dangers of this far land bold men had of late been making their way back into it from the South, cutting down trees, and building themselves places to live in among the more pleasant woods in the valleys and along the river-shores. —The Hobbit
canon fact:
The Lord of the Eagles would not take them anywhere near where men lived. “They would shoot at us with their great bows of yew,” he said, “for they would think we were after their sheep. And at other times they would be right. No! we are glad to cheat the goblins of their sport, and glad to repay our thanks to you, but we will not risk ourselves for dwarves in the southward plains.” —The Hobbit
concern:
It clearly says men had been making their way back into the Wilderness (not that there were sizeable populations living there all the time), and that they were coming from the south, not from the north, where Methelburg is supposed to be. And when refusing to go where people live, the Lord of the Eagles refuses to fly south, but says nothing about people in the north.
canon fact:
Of this kind were the peoples of the upper vales of Anduin: the Beornings, and the Woodmen of Western Mirkwood; and further north and east the Men of the Long Lake and of Dale. —The Return of the King (Appendix F)
concern:
Only the Beornings and Woodmen (i.e., those bold men coming back, up the vale from the south) are listed as the peoples of the upper vales of Anduin. There's no mention of any organized town between Mirkwood and the mountains surviving from the past. This part of the Appendices is longer and discusses the languages of all men (in this particular paragraph those in the northern regions), but when it wants to talk about men to the north of Beornings and Woodmen, it needs to jump eastwards to Long Lake and Dale (having no-one to talk about directly north of Carrock; the Éothéod/Rohirrim are discussed as already having completely migrated south). Also note that Tolkien writes “furhter north and east”, but Long Lake and Dale aren't that much more to the north than the supposed location of Methelburg -- if Tolkien counted the area as far north as this as being populated by Beornings, wouldn't he describe Long Lake and Dale as being mainly “further east”? (And remember, there were basically no “Beornings” as such until after the Battle of Five Armies, Beorn was a loner; so all this is describing a very recent state of affairs.)
Atlas of Middle-earth fact:
The only thing north of Beorn on any of the maps (even the newest) is Framsburg, and that is further north, and marked as ruins.
concern:
If there was a living town nearer to the path of Thorin's company, wouldn't it be marked on the map? Even in the non-canon Middle-earth Role Playing wiki, where the Methelburg description came from, Framsburg is described as about 4 times smaller (340 people vs. 1200), and yet it appears in the Atlas, while Methelburg does not. Also, Framsburg is not described as ruins, which casts even more doubt on the reliability of either the Atlas, or Middle-earth Role Playing wiki.
Can all this be somehow explained and be made to make logical sense? There are also some concerns other than logic, namely scale: adding a town that size in that area kind of breaks the wildness of the Wilderness, I think (it's actually visible from our Mirkwood) -- but that is only my personal opinion. The points above, however, are really dealing with the canon-ness of the town, not just the way it looks in MCME.
Last edited: